Archive for February, 2010

Giant feelings about small things…

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

Why are feelings sometimes oversized? Do you remember how big your house looked when your were a small child? Many years later when you go back to visit, you are surprised to see how modest it really was. Of course you remembered it the way it seemed at the time. Feelings are similar. The younger we are, the bigger feelings feel. When two-year-olds have a meltdown, it is real. At the time, it feels as if the world is coming apart.

Small children don’t have perspective on emotions. Now is forever and big is gigantic. When seemingly minor adult situations trigger giant feelings it is usually because they take us back to a much earlier age, perhaps when we were struggling with problems too big to master. Those feelings and problems were buried and stored away to heal some day.  When you go through the experience with someone you trust, you begin to see through the eyes of the other. Feelings get right-sized as you see from a more adult perspective. (See the main website, Psytx.com for a more extensive explanation of how emotions heal)

  • Share/Bookmark

OMG, Do I Have Neurosis?

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

Paul Simon says it better than anyone, “The nearer your destination, the more you’re slip-slidin’ away.” What I mean is, do you somehow end up missing out on just what you most want in life?  The first few times, you thought it was bad luck, but as you mature, you begin to suspect that somehow it is you? For me, this is the cardinal sign of neurosis.

These are the kinds of problems that affect people who look normal and function reasonably well in the world. Because they tend to target the things that mean the very most to us, they do a great deal of harm. These are the problems that insurance companies don’t want to know about, yet in their quiet way, they tear up as many lives as the more obvious mental disorders.

Neurosis is a term you don’t hear much anymore, but it still has value. Most definitions say that neurosis refers to those emotional problems that are not due to any chemical disturbance of the brain. This means “software,” not “hardware.” On the other hand, we know from computers, that software problems can be as serious as the other kind, and harder to pinpoint.

Even though the dictionary gives a general definition of neuroses as non-physical emotional problems, I prefer to use the psychoanalytic understanding: problems in life that seem mysterious on the surface but are driven by invisible forces from within.

First, let’s look at some self-defeating patterns that are not so mysterious. Early experiential learning, trauma, internalized values and arrested development all can lead to dysfunctional patterns that stop us from achieving. For example, growing up in an untrustworthy environment can lead to problems with trust that undermine success with intimate relationships. Or internalized negative attitudes and can cause low self-esteem and underachievement. The movie “Good Will Hunting” is based on such a pattern. As a final example of a self-defeating behavior based on early learning and development, marrying a person who turns out to have the characteristics of the parent with whom you have unresolved issues often leads to re-creation of the unsolvable conflict. Semi-aware of the goal of “getting it right,” we keep up the hopeless struggle–until and unless awareness clears the way to conscious choice.

No, I’m not talking about those, more clearly understandable problems today, but about patterns with no obvious explanation. A woman in her forties was recognized for her beauty and intelligence, yet she couldn’t make much of her life. She married a man who was no match for her intellectually, and was not even nice. She went to therapy for years with little progress, but stayed. What could be driving such subtle self-defeating behavior? More important, how can these patterns become accessible to change?

This is where the descendants of Freud’s “talking cure,” that is the psychodynamic therapies, provide a unique window on what is happening. Looking through that window, what we find are secret and unacceptable ambitions. It is no wonder that these are not easily revealed. They are so shameful that they have been hidden even from the person who carries them. These are the products of the mind of a child old enough to think and plan and to be aware of right and wrong. At age 4-6 or so, children have a lot of wisdom and sophistication, and are quite capable of coming up with ambitious plans to make things better. I think of these as “someday” plans. Someday I’ll… and that will make life better.

But when it is clear that the plans are not acceptable to the important people in the child’s life, they don’t just disappear, they go underground, out of awareness of the child or anyone else. Wherever it is they go, they remain very powerful and influence behavior in ways that are not obvious. These cherished ambitions are what make us want certain things more than anything else. They can fuel our dreams. When our ambitions are more acceptable, they stay in conscious awareness and are shaped by reality and experience. But when they stay secret, they don’t have a chance to evolve. Furthermore, these plans remain in opposition to our own core values. Those values, an internalized version of whatever it was that made the plans unacceptable in the first place, continue to create opposition to both awareness and fulfillment.

As the woman described above, tried to take better care of herself, she became aware of a powerful and irrational resistance to change. The last thing she wanted to discover was that her ambition was to use her own failure in life as evidence to prove that her parents hadn’t done their job right. She harbored so much guilt about this aggressive goal that her painful failures, in themselves, became punishment. The resulting stalemate is how we get to neurosis, where the things we want most somehow slip through our grasp.

Let’s look at how cognitive therapy approaches this. Cognitive therapy is very ready to take on self-defeating behaviors and specializes in attacking just those dysfunctional values that stand in the way of fulfillment of ambition. On the other hand, part of the behavioral tradition is that you don’t have to know how things got that way. In pure form, cognitive-behavioral therapy doesn’t want to know about the ambitions or the plans, or even why the self-defeating values exist.

CBT will identify the self-defeating behaviors and then go after the internal prohibitions against success. Finding values that make the patient feel guilty and unworthy, CBT will clarify that those values are erroneous and inappropriate. With diligent work, the values may change, and more positive behaviors may be adopted. Even when the treatment goals are achieved, that is, the original self-defeating behaviors have stopped, there may be yet another hurdle. The ambitions may still be in place and are likely still secret. Will the change in values generalize to other manifestations of the same ambitions? It will depend on how thoroughly those values have been addressed and modified.

Psychodynamic therapy will go after the values to some extent, and will also work to bring the ambitions to light. Perhaps not as aggressive in targeting inappropriate values, the psychodynamic therapist will nonetheless be more focused on healing the shame that holds back awareness of the ambition. As these ambitions come more clearly to light, the patient will have a chance to re-evaluate. The solution is to grieve those parts of a five-year-old’s ambition that are not realistic and to adapt those parts that have a place in adult life.

Do you have a neurosis?  Perhaps the best approach of all is to combine the practical focus of CBT with the clarity of a psychodynamic understanding. Why not?

  • Share/Bookmark

What is Codependency?

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

Codependency with an addicted person is sometimes thought of as an addiction in itself, an addiction to helping that actually makes things worse. There is some truth to this, but it paints the codependent as a sick person, which is not so true.  In fact, healthy people including good bosses and even health care professionals fall into codependent patterns. What I see the most of are normal reactions to someone who is lost but rejects real help.

My most sophisticated definition of codependency: Wishful thinking.

Every instance of codependency involves fooling yourself into thinking you can help when you can’t. Concretely, there are four distinct codependent reactions. They often take place in sequence. Each one, while completely natural and understandable, makes the situation worse. A fifth reaction, which is not natural and must usually be learned, actually helps.  Here are the four codependent reactions and the fifth, healthy one.

1.  Denial.  The first reaction is to look the other way, normalize the situation.  “Everyone drinks a little too much from time to time.” Of course this supports the addict’s denial and helps the illness to progress. The addict gains confidence that everything is OK as is.

2.  Control:  Hoping to influence the situation, you avoid parties, you mark the bottles, you plead and nag. Addicts hate to be controlled but love to play cat and mouse. Guess what, the mouse wins. Addicts are happy to let  you be responsible for the good behavior while the addict handles the bad. Attempts to control the addict will soon fail. What’s worse, since you have become involved, the addict will now hold you responsible for the failure. It is no longer his or her problem, it is yours. “You are always on my back. If you would only stop nagging me, then I wouldn’t use drugs!”

3. Anger/Depression:  When your efforts to control the other person fail, you begin to feel angry. Or, depending on your personality, you might start to question yourself and feel depressed and guilty over your failure. Your expressions of anger will bring self pity, “I drink to escape from your constant criticism.”  Your self-doubt will fuel the disease: “That’s right, I get high because you are so inadequate.” Either way, you have only fueled the fire.

4. Rejection:  Finally, you have had it. You have tried everything, and in your frustration and rage, you are ready to blame your addict and banish him or her from your life. Of course that, too is fuel for the self-pity engine that relieves the addict of any remaining sense of responsibility for his or her fate.

5. Detach with Love. This is the healthy one that most people have to learn. Al-anon, the 12 step program for codependents, teaches that you do best to accept that you can’t control the other person and to recognize that he or she isn’t in control either. We feel angry and rejecting when we think the addict WON’T control the problem, but when we realize the truth that he or she CAN’T control it, then the appropriate emotion is sadness. To make it more understandable, think of being at a sports event where you care very much about the outcome but have no power to control it. It is OK to be vocal about your feelings, but you can’t go onto the field and tell the coach and players what to do.

Sometimes detach with love is interpreted as being completely passive. When you can do something effective, please do. For example, protect yourself, think about doing an intervention, consider applying consequences. Just don’t do things you know will be of no help. I only advocate letting go when it is clear that all genuinely helpful actions have been tried. Then, and only then, it is time to accept reality and stop the wishful thinking.

When you actually let go, interesting things may begin to happen. The addicted person no longer has a cozy, comfy foil to play off. The addict feels alone for the first time. There is a sudden cool breeze that may lead to self reflection. Hitting “rock bottom” is not always when things are absolutely terrible. Sometimes it is the dawning of awareness that something in the world is even more precious than the substance and that one can’t have both. Even if there is no awakening, at least you will know that you have done all you realistically can. When you acknowledge this, you will be cured of wishful thinking and codependency.

  • Share/Bookmark

Why not mix psychotherapy theories and techniques?

Monday, February 15th, 2010

Mixer

In the 21st Century, it is time to ask why not rather than why. The reason is that at least half of practicing therapists are already mixing techniques from different traditions and theories. The four main objections have their roots in 19th century science and it’s time for a change in thinking. Here they are:

First, psychoanalytically oriented therapists (I am still more one of these than anything else.) learn early in their careers that they should hold back their feelings and reactions. This often makes them feel ashamed of engaging with patients and reluctant to use more active techniques. In the nineteenth century, scientists thought that if the therapist was a “blank screen,” that would prevent influence on the patient and what they observed would be purely “objective.” Physicists were the first to see that the observer can’t help but influence the observed. Now psychodynamic therapists see, too, that a disengaged therapist has just as much effect on a patient as an engaged one, but the old ideas have a lot of power, especially backed by shame.

Cognitive-behavioral therapists are no less immune to nineteenth century science. In the hope of being completely objective, John Watson, the founder of behaviorism, proclaimed that information gathered from  introspection (looking inside yourself) was subjective, therefore invalid. Similarly, speculation about the past was too subjective to be taken into account. To this day, young behaviorists are taught not to think too much about why, but just to look at behavior. Now there is recognition that humans don’t just react to stimuli like animals, but react to the meanings they give to the stimuli. Attending to individual meanings is much more respectable but again the old prejudices have staying power at the expense of a lot of very useful “subjective” data that other traditions know how to gather and use.

Not to be outdone, psychodynamic training still teaches that you shouldn’t tell people what to do because it will “infantilize” them.  We all know that there are times when your child should tie his or her own shoes, and times when it is right to help out. Therapists are quite able to make the same judgment call. Helping people when it undercuts their own efforts does send the wrong message, but there are many more times when people need all the guidance they can get. Especially now, when so many problems center on compulsive, destructive behaviors, changing those is critical to success. For that, a passive therapist isn’t very effective.

Finally, behaviorally oriented therapists are taught to measure everything. Once I took a tour of the Mississippi Bayou with a swamp guide. He didn’t measure much of anything, but he knew a great deal. Research is useful but experience is, too. Therapy is not research and doesn’t have to be cluttered with protocols and questionnaires for people to change.

So, if it makes sense to you that pure objectivity is a myth of the past, then it might be OK for a therapist to be helpful, human and use good judgment to avoid the pitfalls. Therapists and patients can pool observations, experience, knowledge and intuition from all sources. I have come to think of therapy as a set of emotional tasks for which there are different tools. In the 21st Century, we can focus on finding the best tool for the job whatever tradition it comes from.  Why not?

  • Share/Bookmark

What Would You Like to Know?

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Dear Reader–  PsyTx.com has a new feature, a blog. That’s not all.  I am doing the blog to help with a new book on psychotherapy for both professional and general readers. The book, called, (you guessed it) Moments of Change, at least for now, will tell a lot about how therapy works and how to make it work better.

To be sure that the book responds to the things people really want to know, I would like you to give me your questions.  I will try to answer them in upcoming posts.  Not every question is guaranteed an answer, and I will be looking for themes and topics to address in a more general way.

Disclaimer:  The ideas presented here are only suggestions and may not be right for your individual situation.  They are not a substitute for the advice of a professional who knows you, so please do consult with a licensed professional of your choice regarding the application of any information obtained from this site.

  • Share/Bookmark